You didn't write the code, so you can't personally check whether it's safe. Here's what that actually means, in plain language.
If you built your app with a tool like Lovable, Replit, or Bolt without writing code yourself, you're trusting the tool's output on faith. That's fine for getting to a working demo. It's a real risk once real users, real payments, or real data are involved, because "it works when I click through it" and "it's safe to run in production" are different claims, and only one of them you can verify yourself.
Already know you want this? Email [email protected]. No pitch, just a scoping call. Or keep reading for what matters most in your situation.
The risks that matter, like unlocked database access, missing server-side validation, or unguarded pages, don't show up when you click through your own app. They only show up when someone looks at the code and the configuration directly.
You don't need to learn to code to understand the results. You need someone to tell you, plainly, what's risky and what to do about it.
The tool did what it's designed to do: get you to a working product fast. An audit is the step that was never part of that design.
Yes. The report is written to be read by you, not just an engineer. Anything technical gets explained in terms of what it means for your business, not how it works under the hood.
You mostly can't, on your own. That's exactly why this exists. The issues that matter are invisible from inside the app itself.
No. The audit doesn't require you to have technical staff. If fixes are needed afterward, Mati Systems will tell you honestly whether you can handle them yourself, need a contractor, or want ongoing help.
Most commonly Lovable, Replit, and Bolt, but the review applies to any app you built primarily by prompting an AI tool rather than writing code directly.
If that sounds like where you are, an AI Codebase Audit is the place to start.
Email [email protected] for a free 20-minute call. No pitch, no obligation. Mati Systems usually replies the same day.